Every day, millions of children wake up in a world increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence. Their lessons are personalised by learning algorithms, their entertainment curated by recommendation engines, their behaviour monitored by surveillance systems.
AI offers opportunity: better education, accessibility for children with disabilities, and interactive play that inspires creativity. But it also brings risks—bias, surveillance, exploitation, and the erosion of privacy.
The problem is simple but urgent: we are building AI systems that affect children without adequately considering their unique vulnerabilities, developmental needs, and fundamental rights.
If unaddressed, we risk raising a generation that grows up under algorithmic authority—without their knowledge, consent, or protection.
The Educational Paradox: Promise vs. Practice
Education is the frontline of AI's impact on children. Adaptive platforms promise personalised learning and early intervention, but they also perpetuate bias and narrow children's horizons.
- Case in point: During the pandemic, England's exam algorithm downgraded thousands of state school students while advantaging private school pupils, sparking national outrage.
- Bias in detection tools: AI writing checkers misclassify over half of non-native English writing samples as "AI-generated", yet perform near-perfectly for native speakers. For vulnerable students, this is more barrier than support.
- Tracking futures: When algorithms decide how much challenge a child can handle, they risk reinforcing inequality rather than expanding opportunity.
AI should be a tool for inclusion and empowerment. Instead, it risks becoming a system of quiet gatekeeping.
Surveillance Normalised: Schools as Testing Grounds
Nearly 90% of schools in some countries use monitoring software on student devices. In several districts, hundreds of AI-enabled cameras track children's movements daily.
These tools claim to improve safety. In reality, they condition children to accept surveillance as normal.
- Students report self-censoring in classrooms where their every keystroke is tracked.
- AI systems have flagged children's essays for "concerning" content, leading to referrals to law enforcement.
- New York has already banned facial recognition in schools, recognising the risks to civil rights.
When fear replaces trust in learning environments, we undermine the very purpose of education.
Entertainment & Manipulation
Outside school, children are immersed in AI-driven entertainment. Platforms like YouTube and TikTok deploy recommendation algorithms optimised for engagement—not wellbeing.
Children lack the developmental capacity to fully understand how their choices are being shaped. The result is endless scrolling, exposure to harmful content, and an unhealthy relationship with digital devices.
Laws such as California's Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act attempt to push back, but age verification and consent systems create their own privacy risks.
The question is clear: should children be treated as digital consumers or digital citizens?
The Bias Problem: When Algorithms Reinforce Inequality
AI systems often fail children because their realities are absent from the datasets and design processes:
- Age bias: Most AI is trained on adults, making it less accurate for children's developmental stages.
- Linguistic bias: Non-English speakers face higher error rates.
- Socio-economic bias: Children from low-income families have less access to high-quality AI-powered tools, widening educational gaps.
- Cultural bias: AI reflects the values of the societies where it is built, often ignoring diverse perspectives.
Without deliberate correction, AI risks hard-wiring inequality into childhood itself.
Toward Digital Rights for Children
Children are not passive users—they are rights holders. A child-centred AI framework must include:
- Developmental Appropriateness: Age-sensitive design that supports learning and wellbeing.
- Meaningful Consent: Dynamic, child-friendly systems that give families genuine choice and control.
- Transparency: Clear disclosure when children interact with AI, explained in language they can understand.
- Bias Prevention: Regular audits and inclusive datasets that represent children's real diversity.
- Privacy by Design: Data minimisation, strong safeguards, and strict limits on commercial exploitation.
Shared Responsibility
- Tech companies must embed children's rights into design—not as afterthoughts but as first principles.
- Educators need training to evaluate EdTech ethically and advocate for student privacy.
- Policymakers must treat AI systems that impact children as high-risk and enforce stronger protections.
- Parents and carers require clear tools and information to help children navigate AI systems safely.
- Children themselves must have a voice. Their lived experience is critical for building systems that truly serve them.
The Path Ahead
The stakes are enormous. Today's AI decisions will shape how a generation learns, plays, and understands autonomy and agency.
We have a choice:
- A future where children are tracked, nudged, and shaped by algorithms built for profit.
- Or a future where AI supports creativity, wellbeing, and equitable opportunity.
The children in our schools and homes today will be tomorrow's leaders and innovators. The values we embed in AI now will echo across their lifetimes.
The question is simple: Will we let them grow up algorithmic, or will we let them grow up free?
How is your organisation addressing AI's impact on children? What protections do you believe are most urgent—privacy, bias prevention, or wellbeing safeguards?
Topics
Need guidance on AI governance?
If you're navigating AI ethics, governance challenges, or regulatory compliance, we can help clarify priorities and next steps.
Book a Readiness Consultation